02 Jun 11 Grogg eller grog

Idag är det Folknykterhetens dag och Kristi Himmelfärds dag.

Tog inte Jesus och hans apostlar droger så att de trodde att de flög? Kolkade de inte nattvard så de knappt kunde stå upp? Eller de blev så fulla att de trodde att de drack blod och käkade Jesus kött? Eller drack och åt de verkligen Jesus blod och kött? Är inte sådant åtalbart?

Tja, inte vet jag. Kanske tror de på bilden att de vet.

Idag släpper Global Commission on Drug Policy en 24-sidig rapport om drogpolitik,  som är en svidande vidräkning med ”Kriget mot droger” – alltså den politik som med våld, hot och straff vill nå målet att utrota droger och droganvändande.

Ur rapporten:

”Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won.”

Ett flertal framstående personer hävdar att kriget mot droger har misslyckats. Kriget mot droger har åstadkommit förödande skador för såväl individer som samhällen, runt om i hela världen.

Många av de som deltar i kampanjen är världsberömda även i Sverige och inbegriper fd FN-chefen Kofi Annan, USA’s fd utrikesminister ekonomiprofessorn George Schultz, fd presidenter i Mexico, Brasilien och Colombia, nobelpristagande författaren Mario Vargas Llosa, företagaren Richard Branson, grekiska premiärministern George Papandreou, fd generalsekreteraren för NATO samt EU’s ministerråd Javier Solana, för att inte tala om Sting, Mike Leigh, Julie Christie och  Dame Judi Dench.

Inte krig mot droger

Här följer sammanfattningen ur rapporten:

”Our principles and recommendations can be summarized as follows:

End the criminalization, marginalization and stigmatization of people who use drugs but who do no harm to others. Challenge rather than reinforce common misconceptions about drug markets, drug use and drug dependence.

Encourage experimentation by governments with models of legal regulation of drugs to undermine the power of organized crime and safeguard the health and security of their citizens. This recommendation applies especially to cannabis, but we also encourage other experiments in decriminalization and legal regulation that can accomplish these objectives and provide models for others.

Offer health and treatment services to those in need. Ensure that a variety of treatment modalities are available, including not just methadone and buprenorphine treatment but also the heroin-assisted treatment programs that have proven successful in many European countries and Canada. Implement syringe access and other harm reduction measures that have proven effective in reducing transmission of HIV and other blood-borne infections as well as fatal overdoses. Respect the human rights of people who use drugs. Abolish abusive practices carried out in the name of treatment – such as forced detention, forced labor, and physical or psychological abuse – that contravene human rights standards and norms or that remove the right to self-determination.

Apply much the same principles and policies stated above to people involved in the lower ends of illegal drug markets, such as farmers, couriers and petty sellers. Many are themselves victims of violence and intimidation or are drug dependent. Arresting and incarcerating tens of millions of these people in recent decades has filled prisons and destroyed lives and families without reducing the availability of illicit drugs or the power of criminal organizations.There appears to be almost no limit to the number of people willing to engage in such activities to better their lives, provide for their families, or otherwise escape poverty. Drug control resources are better directed elsewhere.

Invest in activities that can both prevent young people from taking drugs in the first place and also prevent those who do use drugs from developing more serious problems. Eschew simplistic ‘just say no’messages and ‘zero tolerance’ policies in favor of educational efforts grounded in credible information and prevention programs that focus on social skills and peer influences. The most successful prevention efforts may be those targeted at specific at-risk groups.

Focus repressive actions on violent criminal organizations, but do so in ways that undermine their power and reach while prioritizing the reduction of violence and intimidation. Law enforcement efforts should focus not on reducing drug markets per se but rather on reducing their harms to individuals, communities and national security.

Begin the transformation of the global drug prohibition regime. Replace drug policies and strategies driven by ideology and political convenience with fiscally responsible policies and strategies grounded in science, health, security and human rights – and adopt appropriate criteria for their evaluation. Review the scheduling of drugs that has resulted in obvious anomalies like the flawed categorization of cannabis, coca leaf and MDMA. Ensure that the international conventions are interpreted and/or revised to accommodate robust experimentation with harm reduction, decriminalization and legal regulatory policies.

Break the taboo on debate and reform.The time for action is now.”

Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy

Rapporten, finns i engelsk och spansk version.

Dagen till ära tänkte jag dricka något så ursvenskt som en grogg.

Grogg eller grog

Dock visade en snabb undersökning att grogg var en engelsk uppfinning, och varianter av originalet dricks även i Sverige. Den enda pursvenska groggen är enligt Wikipedia”busgroggen” och den frestar mig icke.

Då dricker jag istället en Mojíto de Royal, som är min egen variant av den klassiska mojiton,  blandad på rom (givetvis Havana Club), Schweppes Lemon Fusion och frikostigt med egenodlad mynta.

PS Med detta blogginlägg vill jag på intet vis hävda att någon av de som nämns i texten använder, eller inte använder, droger

Etiketter: drog, EU, grogg, joint, krig, Mojito, mynta, Sting, ursvensk, vackra tänder